Its gone from 'meh, i just dislike dogs' too 'how DARE they have dogs in my advertisments' 'how DARE a person chooses their dog- a pet theyve had longer than my relationship, i'm the partner here!' and ive literally seen petty insults like 'go kiss your dog' or something like its supose to be. tf do you expect with dogs being the most common species of pet in mny developed countries that has internet access? You get posts about people making their neighords dogs being taken away from them with no remorse, or making out certain breeds of dogs to be terrible (and no not just pitbull-like breeds either), they even fucking complain when they see photos of dogs in like reddit's front page. but now its become a circle jerk where they just wank eachother off whenever anything negative that happens to a dog happens and they scree in happiness about it. maybe ciz of previous life experiences, they aint a dog person, alergies etc. They started out as people who just dont like dogs. like idk i'll use r/Dogfree as an example. Then saying it’s unfair to compare a 64 core AMD COU to a 28 core Intel CPU, even though the former was cheaper. Then that people shouldn’t benchmark at all, while still using benchmarks when talking about their own products. Then they complained that people weren’t using the right benchmarks. “Glue” being a fun one, especially because they moved to a similar “glue” in less than a year. Then AMD finally managed to make something properly competitive, and we’ve gone from 4 cores to 16 cores on the desktop in two years, with 64 core workstations available by 2020.Īnd instead of moving to be competitive, Intel has spent a lot of time attacking the perception of AMD’s products. Their highest end processors went from 4 cores for $1,000 in 2007 to 6 cores for $2,000 in 2017. The high end desktop computers went from 4 cores at 3 GHz in 2007 to 4 cores at 3.5 GHz in 2017. Intel spent billions of dollars keeping their competitor from getting any contracts, then spent more than a decade doing barely anything to move the industry forward while ensuring that every tiny little improvement they did make, couldn’t be used with older equipment through forced obsolescence. I think the reasons are anti-competitive, anti-consumer, anti-improvement behavior. 15:29:40 "Would you date a girl with an OnlyFans account?" | The gauntlet is thrown down as the 'cucks', 'simps', and 'incels' battle it out in /r/NoStupidQuestions. 13:01:22 Just a spat about whether the R-word is a slur in /r/pcgaming Who cares? Definitely not this one guy who just keeps posting and posting. 19:20:46 A black cosplayer dresses up as a white character in /r/Overwatch.
INTEL BLEEP SOFTWARE SOFTWARE
13:57:02 Intel releases software capable of *bleeping* out racial slurs. 15:11:04 "It quite literally is the definition of pornography" | /r/pics demonstrates that they are capable of drama beyond "woman posing with art" in today's drama, featuring a woman posing with. 14:22:10 Are you toxic if you call teammates "trashcans"? Is "cunt" a slur? All this and more in today's edition of "It's Only Unfair When *I* Get Banned!"
Just kidding, it's obviously a dumpster fire! Discussion about it on Reddit is deep, nuanced, and informed.
INTEL BLEEP SOFTWARE PS4
20:02:01 Sony announces that they have released a new PS4 Theme in support of Black Lives Matter. 23:45:29 OP posts in /r/PersonalFinanceCanada complaining about not getting a raise this year becomes belligerent and condescending to just about everyone. 20:26:35 More CDPR/Cyberpunk 2077 crunch drama, as a segment of a Game Informer podcast suggests that employees were happy to work mandatory overtime. Out of 100, my applications with a male name got 10 responses to interview Out of 100, my applications with a female name got 87 responses to interview The female resume got 870% more responses.15:42:18 "It's either racist, or it's not." | In a thread discussing a video of an adult hitting on a 13-year-old, the *real* drama is whether a black man saying the N-word is racist or not. Sometimes the male went first, sometimes the female went first. Made a fake resume, and responded to craigslist ads with both male and female names. So then I thought "what about someone looking for working class jobs?" So I decided to focus on restaurants- servers, hosting, etc. Out of 100, my applications with a female name got 45 responses to interview The female resume was 650% more likely to get a callback. Out of 100, my applications with a male name got 7 responses for interview. I'd send it out with my real name, then a few days later (or few days before) with a female name. So I took my CV and changed the name to a female name. It's MUCH better being a woman So I did an experiment, I work in CS and decided to test what the gender bias is. 29.6K 1.3K sent 100 applications as a man and a woman.